登 录
註 冊
论坛
微波仿真网
注册
登录论坛可查看更多信息
微波仿真论坛
>
Keysight EEsof 专区
>
ADS
>
ads优化时current EF得不了0,怎么办?
发帖
回复
3029
阅读
2
回复
[
版主推荐
]
ads优化时current EF得不了0,怎么办?
离线
dave_li
我是一个菜鸟
UID :68069
注册:
2010-10-21
登录:
2010-12-08
发帖:
13
等级:
仿真新人
0楼
发表于: 2010-11-03 19:01:02
仿真结果如下
D}3XFuZs_
Iteration/Trial #0:
TO,rxf
CurrentEF: 2499.99999991314
Y,8KPg@W
Optimization variables:
c.\O/N
TL2.L = 22.2767e-03
G1 o70
TL1.L = 22.2767e-03
l:]Nn%U(>
PN+G:Qv
Nominal Optimization found no improvement in performance.
pS 4&w8s
The initial solution may be an optimal solution under the constraints.
(yo;NKq,@
Possible remedies include:
7 1W5.!
1p`+
- Try a different optimization method. Perhaps Random first,
9]$8MY
Gradient second.
+D#Z n!P
- Check to insure optimization variables are sensitive to goals.
iAMtejw
- Relax the specification, later re-tightening.
8 6QE/M
- For Random-type optimizers, increase the number of trials.
f^e6<5gdf
- If the simulation fails to converge for Random-type optimizers,
6pE :A@
try using a Gradient method.
+&KQ28r
- Check that the Error Function "EF" is not initially zero.
b=a!j=-D
If it is, you may tighten the specification.
t<:D@J]a
J` {6l
Optim1[1] reached the iteration limit.
xr(|*
0e["]Tlnm
Resource usage:
Uh.Zi3X6}6
Total stopwatch time: 11.66 seconds.
5sde
Q Z8QQ`*S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
,G^[o,hS
Simulation finished: dataset `adsms' written in:
NkxCs
`E:\users\default\ads_prj/data ..
Y^"4?96
z41_oG7
未注册仅能浏览
部分内容
,查看
全部内容及附件
请先
登录
或
注册
附件:
未命名.rar
(19 K) 下载次数:15
共
条评分
菜鸟
离线
g0dfather
UID :39120
注册:
2009-08-11
登录:
2012-06-05
发帖:
279
等级:
退休版主
1楼
发表于: 2010-11-03 19:22:23
2499也差太远了吧,结构原理有问题吧,要不就是你设错了
共
条评分
离线
ypoc
UID :54571
注册:
2010-03-14
登录:
2013-05-23
发帖:
347
等级:
积极交流四级
2楼
发表于: 2010-11-03 22:54:14
优化方式你就选那个 Gradient,应该很快就能收敛了
83X/"2-K
w zdxw$E
z^"?sd
OPTIM Optim1[1] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT> optIter=(0->80)
hN!.@L
[!5l0{0
SP Optim1[1].SP1[0] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT> optIter=0 freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz)
ayN*fiV]
.................................................................................
]KzJ u`O%G
Iteration/Trial #0:
<)"iL4 kDI
CurrentEF: 2498.98126301429
B piEAwh
Optimization variables:
Scf.4~H 0
TL1.L = 1e-03
3!1&DII4
TL2.L = 1e-03
~LSy7$rz
Iteration/Trial #1:
;,R[]B01u
CurrentEF: 2478.05290788602
+ I?Qg
Optimization variables:
@i\7k(9:A
TL1.L = 49.9933e-03
%OTQRe:
TL2.L = 481.214e-06
hgNY[,
'! #On/
。。。。。。。。
e3G7K8
tvv[$b&
SP Optim1[1].SP1[54] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT> optIter=54 freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz)
uF.Q " ,<
...............................................................
e_tZja2s
..................
&`-_)~5]
Iteration/Trial #55:
`NTM%# w
CurrentEF: 1.15108786323448
7O]J^H+7
Optimization variables:
{-~05,zE
TL1.L = 47.7068e-03
?]759,Q3L
TL2.L = 26.403e-03
;B,nzx(L
hYs82P|2Ol
SP Optim1[1].SP1[55] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT> optIter=55 freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz)
6hR^qdHg
.................................................................................
{H/8#y4qp&
Iteration/Trial #56:
eUi> Mp
CurrentEF: 0.0364796239559944
xq8}6Q
Optimization variables:
@#'yPV1
TL1.L = 47.7045e-03
jt0H5-x
TL2.L = 26.403e-03
wV7@D[8
S5zpUF=
SP Optim1[1].SP1[56] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT> optIter=56 freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz)
cu)@P 0I
.................................................................................
0-6:AHix
Iteration/Trial #57:
F0X5dv
CurrentEF: 0
n U+pnkMj
Optimization variables:
)*"T
TL1.L = 47.7045e-03
mrw]yu;2<n
TL2.L = 26.4058e-03
oNh68ON:c
vsOdp:Yp9!
SP Optim1[1].SP1[57] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT> optIter=57 freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz)
R?1idl)
.................................................................................
B4PW4>GF
Optim1[1] reached the goals.
JS }_q1H
U&