[版主推荐]ads优化时current EF得不了0，怎么办？

仿真结果如下 nMa^Eq#  
Iteration/Trial #0: &0eB@8{N  
  CurrentEF: 2499.99999991314 M$W#Q\<*#r  
  Optimization variables: R>U<8z"i  
    TL2.L = 22.2767e-03 qQcC[50  
    TL1.L = 22.2767e-03 +7Lco"\w<  
Uaj=}p\+.p  
  Nominal Optimization found no improvement in performance. j>Z]J'P  
  The initial solution may be an optimal solution under the constraints. 3.0c/v5Go  
  Possible remedies include: QBw ZfX  
Z :9VxZ  
    - Try a different optimization method. Perhaps Random first, 0;h1LI)  
      Gradient second. ThlJhTh<%4  
    - Check to insure optimization variables are sensitive to goals. ?iLd5 Z  
    - Relax the specification, later re-tightening. @NNLzqqY  
    - For Random-type optimizers, increase the number of trials. [4hO3):F  
    - If the simulation fails to converge for Random-type optimizers, f0`' i[  
      try using a Gradient method. uBTT {GGQ  
    - Check that the Error Function "EF" is not initially zero. H|)1T-%  
  If it is, you may tighten the specification. xs I/DW  
huoKr  
Optim1[1] reached the iteration limit. Crhi+D  
P{Z71a5  
Resource usage: (K6`nWk2  
    Total stopwatch time: 11.66 seconds. Qkib;\2  
Doh|G:P]#  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;F""}wzn  
Simulation finished: dataset `adsms' written in: ]Z-oUO Z<k  
  `E:\users\default\ads_prj/data .. !~N4}!X3du  
z;C=d(|nN  

未注册仅能浏览部分内容，查看全部内容及附件请先 登录 或 注册

2499也差太远了吧，结构原理有问题吧，要不就是你设错了

优化方式你就选那个 Gradient，应该很快就能收敛了 3qiJwo
>  
@VC .>  
%{7_E*I@n  
OPTIM Optim1[1] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT>  optIter=(0->80) f6B-~x<l  
VW9>xVd4  
SP Optim1[1].SP1[0] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT>  optIter=0  freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz) 1l+kO,X]  
................................................................................. 9q1HSJ1)  
Iteration/Trial #0: Pr5g6I'G   
  CurrentEF: 2498.98126301429 7}ws |4Y  
  Optimization variables: .Iwur;/\  
    TL1.L = 1e-03 6F*-qb3  
    TL2.L = 1e-03 _ktK+8*6`  
Iteration/Trial #1: 2.LJp}>  
  CurrentEF: 2478.05290788602 %j'G.*TD  
  Optimization variables: 2(m85/Hr\;  
    TL1.L = 49.9933e-03 S jVsF1d_  
    TL2.L = 481.214e-06 X,TTM,1w  
~=:2~$gsn  
。。。。。。。。 7m:|u*ij2~  
U g}8y8  
SP Optim1[1].SP1[54] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT>  optIter=54  freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz) uC,"5C  
............................................................... r$GPYyHK  
.................. DS:>/m>)  
Iteration/Trial #55: rQ~\~g[tP  
  CurrentEF: 1.15108786323448 ]V36-
%^  
  Optimization variables: ietRr!$.  
    TL1.L = 47.7068e-03 c62dorDqy  
    TL2.L = 26.403e-03 {f+N]Oo*  
~u /aOd  
SP Optim1[1].SP1[55] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT>  optIter=55  freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz) [1{SY=)  
................................................................................. d4Co^A&  
Iteration/Trial #56: p)B33ZzC  
  CurrentEF: 0.0364796239559944 EBoGJ_l  
  Optimization variables: GilQtd3\  
    TL1.L = 47.7045e-03 R_1)mPQ^P  
    TL2.L = 26.403e-03 -t8hi+NK  
>4n+PXRXX  
SP Optim1[1].SP1[56] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT>  optIter=56  freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz) Oj4v#GK]  
................................................................................. J~Cc9"(  
Iteration/Trial #57:
PiMKu|,3  
  CurrentEF: 0 JEWL)  
  Optimization variables: .
dx 4,|6  
    TL1.L = 47.7045e-03 3CR@' qG-  
    TL2.L = 26.4058e-03  hv+|s(  
)0#j\B  
SP Optim1[1].SP1[57] <E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj\networks\RF_MT>  optIter=57  freq=(2.2 GHz->2.6 GHz)
j G-  
................................................................................. {=UFk-$=  
Optim1[1] reached the goals. @$qOW  
]} 61vV  
Resource usage: No`|m0 :j  
    Total stopwatch time: 24.33 seconds. 5D,.^a1 A  
_u&>&,:q  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X'fuF2owd  
Simulation finished: dataset `RF_MT' written in: t})
lr\  
  `E:\ADS_PRO\MT\OPT_prj/data' i2){xg~c  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------