[常见问题]cst 官方网站的关于边界的解释

离线jimliu12

说句话。。。好朋友们。。。

UID ：1273

注册：2007-03-18
登录：2024-07-26
发帖：535
等级：论坛版主

0楼发表于: 2007-10-16 16:16:54

— 本帖被 hefang 从 CST 移动到本区(2010-05-06) —

What is the difference between "open" and "open add space" if shapes touch the boundary? (Faq #102)
(Last modified: 21 Feb. 2005) Add to My FAQs

The PML "open" boundary operator extends the cross section found at the bounding box to infinity, thus an inifite ground plane can be simulated for example. Therefore if you want to model a finite structure, it should not touch the open boundary. The "open add space" boundary is a very convenient way to introduce an additional spacing that is sufficiently large to guarantee correct operation of the open boundary operator.

When and how to use conducting walls? (Faq #107)
(Last modified: 21 Feb. 2005) Add to My FAQs

Conducting walls are most helpful if the structure under investigation is non-radiating (e.g. straight microstrip lines) and cost-effective closed boundaries instead of the PML shall be used. In contrast to electric/magnetic boundaries unwanted box modes can be suppressed after introducing small conductivities in the order of 1E3. We recommend to check all results carefully and to adjust the setting if necessary.

Can instabilities be produced by wrong settings for the PML boundary? (Faq #108)
(Last modified: 9 Feb. 2006) Add to My FAQs

To ensure the proper function of the PML, a certain distance between the source of radiation and the bounding box as well as a resonable thickness/grading of the PML layer is necessary. Otherwise parts of the energy leaving the calculation domain might be reflected instead of being absorbed. This can cause inaccuracies or in rare cases numerical instabilities.

Instabilities due to the PML typically come up at a late stage of a calculation. If problems like this are observed, please consider to in ..

未注册仅能浏览部分内容，查看全部内容及附件请先登录或注册

共1条评分

学着坚强

RFEDA币 +2

优秀资料+1~3

2007-10-16

离线学着坚强

难得糊涂

UID ：6