登 录
註 冊
论坛
微波仿真网
注册
登录论坛可查看更多信息
微波仿真论坛
>
学术文献资源区
>
IEEE文献共享
>
Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and s ..
发帖
回复
1200
阅读
0
回复
[其它]
Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines
离线
polarm
UID :18875
注册:
2008-10-10
登录:
2015-06-19
发帖:
1026
等级:
准仿真大师级
0楼
发表于: 2008-10-27 21:58:19
Abstract
T{1Z(M+
A study is presented to compare the performance of gear fault detection using artificial neural networks
y{~l&zrl
(ANNs) and support vector machines (SMVs). The time-domain vibration signals of a rotating machine
c;w%R8z
with normal and defective gears are processed for feature extraction. The extracted features from original
o|\0IG(\
and preprocessed signals are used as inputs to both classifiers based on ANNs and SVMs for two-class
<<@vy{*Hg
(normal or fault) recognition. The number of nodes in the hidden layer, in case of ANNs, and the radial
8~QEJW$
basis function kernel parameter, in case of SVMs, along with the selection of input features are optimised
sK~d{)+T
using genetic algorithms (GAs). For each trial, the ANNs and SVMs are trained with a subset of the
Zy BN o]
experimental data for known machine conditions. The trained ANNs and SVMs are tested using the
4}:a"1P"
remaining set of data. The procedure is illustrated using the experimental vibration data of a gearbox. The
[KIK}:
roles of different vibration signals, obtained under both normal and light loads, and at low and high
>gAq/'.Q
sampling rates, are investigated. The results compare the effectiveness of both types of classifiers without
<Z^t^ O
and with GA-based selection of features and the classifier parameters. For most of the cases considered, the
@\,WJmW
classification accuracy of SVM is better than ANN, without GA. With GA-based selection, the
V j\1HQ
performance of both classifiers are comparable, in most cases, with three selected features. However, for
:eQ?gM!,
SVMs with six features, 100% classification success is achieved in all test cases. The training time of SVMs
y6|&bJ @
is substantially less compared to ANNs in all cases considered. The present classification accuracy
n>F1G MX
compares well with ..
gn&jNuGg
;eznONNF
未注册仅能浏览
部分内容
,查看
全部内容及附件
请先
登录
或
注册
附件:
sdarticle[1].pdf
(294 K) 下载次数:2
共
1
条评分
admin
rf币
+5
积极参与
2008-10-27
海阔凭鱼跃,天高任鸟飞
发帖
回复